<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Architect&#8217;s and Engineer&#8217;s &#8220;Standard of Care&#8221; (Law note)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=standard-of-care</link>
	<description>A blog for architects, engineers, designers, &#38; other construction professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mine is better than yours! Battle of the experts in the construction lawsuit (Law &#38; Order: Hard Hat files Part 6)</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/#comment-5031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mine is better than yours! Battle of the experts in the construction lawsuit (Law &#38; Order: Hard Hat files Part 6)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=503#comment-5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] then usually issue an opinion as to whether or not you, as the design professional, violated the professional standard of care for architects or engineers working on a similar project in a similar [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then usually issue an opinion as to whether or not you, as the design professional, violated the professional standard of care for architects or engineers working on a similar project in a similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineering for the Earthquake- Dumbarton Bridge (News Note)</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineering for the Earthquake- Dumbarton Bridge (News Note)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=503#comment-4677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] account for potential massive shifts during a quake.  (This is what is legally known as the professional standard of care, which takes into account what similar engineers, in the same conditions and community, would [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] account for potential massive shifts during a quake.  (This is what is legally known as the professional standard of care, which takes into account what similar engineers, in the same conditions and community, would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Engineer: Immune or not in Sewer collapse? (Part 2) (law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Engineer: Immune or not in Sewer collapse? (Part 2) (law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=503#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Court also held that CH2M owed a duty of care, as all such professionals do, and that the duty extended to the injured employees. The Court found [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court also held that CH2M owed a duty of care, as all such professionals do, and that the duty extended to the injured employees. The Court found [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standard of Care for Engineers- the Jury Instruction (law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Standard of Care for Engineers- the Jury Instruction (law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=503#comment-92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] previously talked about the standard of care for design professionals on construction [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] previously talked about the standard of care for design professionals on construction [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why words matter (aka Shakespeare for Architects &#38; Engineers) (Law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/06/24/standard-of-care/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Why words matter (aka Shakespeare for Architects &#38; Engineers) (Law note) &#171; Construction Law in North Carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=503#comment-91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Instead of best (or highest) standards, try meet the professional standard of care [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Instead of best (or highest) standards, try meet the professional standard of care [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
