Follow your Change Order Requirements

 check markIt is extremely important that you follow your written contract requirements.  No where is this more evident than in the change order process.

Most contracts have an explicit provision for the payment for additional work– and they generally require a written, signed change order (or change directive) before the work is performed.  Can you get by with verbal agreements for additional work? Sometimes yes, sometimes no.  Will it be much harder to get paid for additional services without a signed change order? You bet.  So why put yourself through that trouble?

Often times parties begin to “waive” formal requirements for written change orders, and construction projects are often on tight deadlines where stopping work to get a fully executed change order would bog down the schedule.  However, you run the risk of throwing yourself on the mercy of the Court when you don’t play by the contract rules.

A new case out of the Eastern District of Virginia demonstrates this fact very clearly.  In Artistic Stone v. Safeco, 2010 WL 2977894 (E.D.Va July 27, 2010), the Court held that the requirement that change orders be in writing was to be strictly construed and the subcontractor in that case could not recover for verbal change orders that violated the written change order requirement.  The Court held that where there is a method to ensure recovery of additional extra work in the written contract, the subcontractor could not recover additional money when it failed to follow that method.

“Written change order requirements maintain order and predictability in the construction business, and are meant ‘to avoid subsequent disagreement, and prevent just such a controversy as has arisen in this case.  For this reason, ‘where there is a method under the contract by which a party can insure the recovery of the cost of extra work, that party is not entitled to recovery where it fails to follow that method.'” Artistic Stone Crafters at 5.   [Internal citations omitted.]

A North Carolina court would likely concur.

To ensure you can fully recover for extra work, make sure it is authorized.  Follow the contract.  If circumstances make it so you cannot always follow the contract terms, document the situation as best as you can.  A follow-up email, confirming a verbal change order, would at least provide written evidence you can present in Court, should it come to that.  Otherwise, arguments can and will be made that the person who gave the change order wasn’t authorized to do so, and you may be stuck with no recovery for the extra work.

_______________________

Photo “white check mark on blue- acrylic on canvas” by kylemac via Flickr via Creative Commons license.

Tues Tip | NC HUB Requirements for state construction projects

If you bid on state work in North Carolina, or want to, you should be aware of the Office for Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUB).   [You should also be aware that there may be changes coming soon in light of a recent 4th Circuit Decision with regard to who still qualifies as a HUB.]

Historically Underutilized Businesses logo

1.  What does the HUB office do?

The HUB office is set up to:

  • help qualifying companies become listed vendors in their database
  • help contractors find HUB companies to solicit subcontractor bids from
  • answer questions about the HUB process for bidders

2.  Who qualifies as a HUB business?

By statute, a HUB business is one in which at least 51% ownership and control is held by minorities, women, disabled, and/or disadvantaged owners.  If you think you qualify, get certified! It can only give you more opportunities for public work.

3.  If I bid on a state contract, how do I comply with the HUB requirements?

Under the HUB statute, each bidder must do one of the following:

  •  identify on his bid the minority businesses that will be used and for what percentage of the contract;
  • sign an affidavit and provide documentation listing the good faith efforts to comply [see below]; or
  • sign an affidavit that all work will be self-performed

4.  What activities qualify as “good faith efforts” to identify a HUB subcontractor?

The statute provides that good faith efforts include:

(1)        Contacting minority businesses that reasonably could have been expected to submit a quote and that were known to the contractor or available on State or local government maintained lists at least 10 days before the bid or proposal date and notifying them of the nature and scope of the work to be performed.

(2)        Making the construction plans, specifications and requirements available for review by prospective minority businesses, or providing these documents to them at least 10 days before the bid or proposals are due.

(3)        Breaking down or combining elements of work into economically feasible units to facilitate minority participation.

(4)        Working with minority trade, community, or contractor organizations identified by the Office of Historically Underutilized Businesses and included in the bid documents that provide assistance in recruitment of minority businesses.

(5)        Attending any prebid meetings scheduled by the public owner.

(6)        Providing assistance in getting required bonding or insurance or providing alternatives to bonding or insurance for subcontractors.

(7)        Negotiating in good faith with interested minority businesses and not rejecting them as unqualified without sound reasons based on their capabilities. Any rejection of a minority business based on lack of qualification should have the reasons documented in writing.

(8)        Providing assistance to an otherwise qualified minority business in need of equipment, loan capital, lines of credit, or joint pay agreements to secure loans, supplies, or letters of credit, including waiving credit that is ordinarily required. Assisting minority businesses in obtaining the same unit pricing with the bidder’s suppliers in order to help minority businesses in establishing credit.

(9)        Negotiating joint venture and partnership arrangements with minority businesses in order to increase opportunities for minority business participation on a public construction or repair project when possible.

(10)      Providing quick pay agreements and policies to enable minority contractors and suppliers to meet cash‑flow demands.

Depending on which public entity is involved, different weight may be assigned to different parts of this criteria, or additional criteria may be required.

5.  What documentation is necessary to prove good faith efforts?

The short answer is, “it depends”.  The statute requires “all” documentation be provided.  If you are telephoning minority businesses and getting verbal denials, you must find a way to document that.  Better practice would be to send written requests for bids to HUB-certified businesses, so you can maintain a copy for submission with your bid.  The HUB website even has instructions for creating a HUB vendor/contractor Excel spreadsheet to track your efforts.

6.  Is the HUB process related to my local MBE/WBE [Minority-owned/Women-owned  Business Enterprise] certification?

As of last summer, there is now a statewide process to getting certified, the Statewide Uniform Certification (SWUC).  This change was made to streamline and centralize the HUB certification process and HUB database.

————–

Logo from NCDOA HUB website.

 

Those Pesky “Gentlemen’s Agreements”

handshake

Head on over to Construction Law Musings today to read my guest post on why you should never rely on a “gentlemen’s agreement” for a construction project.  Handshakes are well and good, but put it in writing.  Same goes for any agreement, really.  Read, review, and understand your contracts, settlement agreements, and warranty deeds.

 A written document almost always trumps oral “understandings,” so why chance your business to anything less?

________________________

Photo “handshake I” by oooh.oooh [Álvaro Canivell] via Flickr via Creative Commons License.

 

Construction Law Musings: Sneak Peek

Regular readers know that “Construction Law Musings,” written by Virginia attorney Christopher Hill, has been a regular on my blogroll since its inception.  Chris regularly features guest writers for his series “Guest Post Fridays.”  He has graciously invited me to be tomorrow’s Guest Author.

pencilPlease visit his blog tomorrow to read all about the scary concept of “gentlemen’s agreements” in the construction contest.  Until then, you might enjoy visiting some of Chris’ earlier posts at “Musings“.

____________________

Clip Art licensed from Clip Art Gallery on DiscoverySchool.com. 

 

Exception to the Statute of Repose?

Hold the phone– didn’t I just say last week that the statute of repose was basically an absolute bar to any action after 6 years?  Why, yes, yes I did.

BUT it too has exceptions!  (If you’ve learned anything from my rantings, I hope it is that there is always an exception to the rule).  In a recent Court of Appeals case, the application of the statute of repose was called into question.

In Dawson v. N.C. Dept of Environment and Natural Resources (June 15, 2010), a couple bought land only after inquiring of the Person County health department to determine that the lots perked.  Based on a 1989 letter issued by the health department stating that the lots perked, the couple bought the land.  In 2000 (that is, 11 years later!), the couple applied for building permits only to learn from DENR that the land was not suitable for building.

The couple sued DENR under a negligence theory, and DENR argued the time bar of the 6 year statute of repose.  In its decision, the court held that because the 1989 letter was not based on an improvement to real property, the statute of repose was not applicable.  The Court indicated that, had the county inspector been inspecting an existing septic system, their decision may have been different.

Moral of the story? Just because you think you have a good defense, don’t forget that there is always an exception to the rule or, rather, there are many times when the shoe looks like it fits, but it really doesn’t.  Be careful– blisters are painful!

boot

Photo “Dakota Composite Dual Toe” by Bottinex via Flickr via Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Sharealike license