Setting the Right Expectations for Owner Clients is a must, as I recently wrote in my post discussing Scope of Work clauses.
According to construction consultant Tony Frisby,* scope of work issues are more important than general conditions in the management of a project.
Tony notes, however, that it is not always possible to change Scope of Work clauses in every situation:
“For example, if bidding on advertised procurement, any modifications in the bid may very well be a basis of rejection as non-responsive; the subcontractor is bound the same rule as to the scope of work in the general contract. In negotiated contracts, two step and design build, of course, the contractor can delineate modifications or exclusions.
In subcontract agreements, we recommend that a Scope Letter do exactly what you have indicated, with emphasis on duties by others, such as hoisting and services provided by others. Obviously, we recommend the deletion of ridiculous clauses such as No Damages for Delay.”
Tony’s point is a valid one– those dealing with a Bidding situation cannot change the Scope of Work. Most architects & engineers enjoy more flexibility here than contractors, and can work on scope of work as part of an Request for Proposal response. Tony’s point about subcontractor agreements is equally applicable to agreements with subconsultants as well.
* Tony Frisby specializes in prevention and non-judicial resolution of construction disputes. He also assists companies in organizational improvements.
Agree? Disagree? Share your thoughts with Tony and me, below.
Photo credit: Financial Times via Creative Commons license.