<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Construction Law in North Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructionlawnc.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructionlawnc.com</link>
	<description>A blog for architects, engineers, designers, &#38; other construction professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developers Rejoice Over Impact Fees Decision (news note) by Melissa Dewey Brumback</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2011/12/02/developers-rejoice/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Dewey Brumback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=2556#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Developers often do bear the brunt-- the problem in this particular case was that it was the Town of Cary trying to get fees for Cary students only, when there is no Cary-only school district.  Further, there is the issue of statutory authority, but municipalities do often impose impact fees for utility issues etc associated with developments.  Since I actually live in Southern Village, I concur in your assessment there.  Also, as I have a rising Kindergartener, I enjoy knowing (knock on wood) where my child will be going to school, which is something that can be an unknown for those in Wake County.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developers often do bear the brunt&#8211; the problem in this particular case was that it was the Town of Cary trying to get fees for Cary students only, when there is no Cary-only school district.  Further, there is the issue of statutory authority, but municipalities do often impose impact fees for utility issues etc associated with developments.  Since I actually live in Southern Village, I concur in your assessment there.  Also, as I have a rising Kindergartener, I enjoy knowing (knock on wood) where my child will be going to school, which is something that can be an unknown for those in Wake County.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Developers Rejoice Over Impact Fees Decision (news note) by Annetta Hoggard</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2011/12/02/developers-rejoice/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Annetta Hoggard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=2556#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing some research on school impact fees because Wake County Public School System is in dire straights regarding schools and rapid growth.  This has resulted in the current &quot;fruit basket turnover&quot; (quoting my mother) that is the new Choice Assignment Plan.  Why shouldn&#039;t developers bear some of the brunt?  I think Southern Village in Chapel Hill is an excellent model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing some research on school impact fees because Wake County Public School System is in dire straights regarding schools and rapid growth.  This has resulted in the current &#8220;fruit basket turnover&#8221; (quoting my mother) that is the new Choice Assignment Plan.  Why shouldn&#8217;t developers bear some of the brunt?  I think Southern Village in Chapel Hill is an excellent model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Active vs. Passive Negligence (Law note) by TrevorSpear.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Explaining Negligence in the Construction Industry</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/10/28/activevspassive/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorSpear.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Explaining Negligence in the Construction Industry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=1161#comment-1842</guid>
		<description>[...] parties.  [Editor&#039;s Note: The parties may have rights to recover against each other if one is actively negligent and one is only passively negligent.  Otherwise, joint &amp; several [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] parties.  [Editor&#039;s Note: The parties may have rights to recover against each other if one is actively negligent and one is only passively negligent.  Otherwise, joint &amp; several [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nixon, Clinton, Edwards- and construction claim? What&#8217;s the connection? The cover up. by Melissa Dewey Brumback</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2012/03/30/nixon-clinton/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Dewey Brumback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=3118#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>True, Dave, true!  (Just because your paranoid doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t out to get you!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Dave, true!  (Just because your paranoid doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t out to get you!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Improving the relationship between general contractors &amp; architects/engineers (Tues Tip guest post) by Architects + Contractors = A Better Result &#171; Collaborative Methods. Extraordinary Results.</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2011/11/29/improving-relationship/#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>Architects + Contractors = A Better Result &#171; Collaborative Methods. Extraordinary Results.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=2503#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>[...] Improving the Relationship Between General Contractors and Architects/Engineers Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Improving the Relationship Between General Contractors and Architects/Engineers Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shameless Self Promotion (Please Vote!) by Dave</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2012/03/23/shameless-self/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=3089#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>Got my vote</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my vote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nixon, Clinton, Edwards- and construction claim? What&#8217;s the connection? The cover up. by Dave</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2012/03/30/nixon-clinton/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=3118#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Fine print is always out to get you...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fastenernetwork.co.za/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine print is always out to get you&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fastenernetwork.co.za/" rel="nofollow">Dave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liquidated Damages: what, when, &amp; why by Melissa Dewey Brumback</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/09/30/liquidated-damages-what-when-why/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Dewey Brumback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=1090#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>Hi Florence.  If there are no set liquidated damages, then you must prove actual damages.  You can also get consequential or incidental damages, and sometimes special damages, if you can prove them too.  Usually experts are used to establish the damages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Florence.  If there are no set liquidated damages, then you must prove actual damages.  You can also get consequential or incidental damages, and sometimes special damages, if you can prove them too.  Usually experts are used to establish the damages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liquidated Damages: what, when, &amp; why by florence okwuafiaka</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/2010/09/30/liquidated-damages-what-when-why/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>florence okwuafiaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?p=1090#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>I want to know when monetary damages  is not fixed by the court, what is termed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know when monetary damages  is not fixed by the court, what is termed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Download White Paper by Melissa Dewey Brumback</title>
		<link>http://constructionlawnc.com/download-white-paper/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Dewey Brumback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructionlawnc.com/?page_id=2720#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Sure thing George from Bulgaria!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure thing George from Bulgaria!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

