Careful! Your contract may create uninsurable loss

 

Kent Holland
Kent Holland

Today’s Guest Post is by  J. Kent Holland, a construction lawyer located in Tysons Corner, Virginia,  with a national practice representing design professionals, contractors and project owners.  He is also founder & president of ConstructionRisk, LLC, a consulting firm providing consulting services to owners, design professionals, contractors and attorneys on construction projects.    His guest post is very timely, considering last week’s post on insurance check-ups for your business.   

 

Agreeing to Pay Reasonable Attorneys Fees as Part of Indemnification May Create Uninsurable Loss

 A question that is asked with increasing frequency is whether attorneys fees incurred pursuant to an indemnity clause are insurable where they are not incurred due to a duty to defend (i.e., paid on behalf of the indemnitee) but are instead paid after the litigation is complete and the indemnitor (e.g., engineer) is found liable for damages due to its negligence.  The short answer is that unless the court would have awarded the attorneys fees against the engineer in the absence of the contractual obligation to pay attorneys that was created by the indemnification provision, the attorneys fees will not be covered by the professional liability policy.  The contractual liability exclusion of the policy applies to such contractually created attorneys fees obligation.

A typical indemnification clause that includes payment of attorneys fees as part of indemnification rather than as part of a duty to defend is the following:

INDEMNIFICATION

The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner, its  parent,  affiliates and their respective directors, officers and employees (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, judgments,  demands,  losses, costs, liability, damages, and expenses, of any kind (including reasonable attorneys fees)   for  injuries  to  persons  (including but not limited to death) or damage to property to the extent any  of the foregoing are caused by any negligent act, error, or omission of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and  persons  for  whom  Consultant  is  legally responsible in  the performance of the Services.

Although this clause may look innocuous in that the indemnification is limited to negligence, it may nevertheless create uninsurable loss by virtue of the attorneys fees that are included in the indemnification.  Under American Jurisprudence, the courts do not award attorneys fees to the prevailing party unless the contract creates such a duty or unless there is some legal basis such as a civil statute that would establish the basis for the award of attorneys fees.

An insurance broker was recently asked by his client (an engineering firm) to consider the insurance ramifications of an indemnification clause somewhat similar to what was quoted above.  Instead of containing the reference to reasonable attorneys fee within its text, however, the clause included an additional sentence that stated:  “Consultant shall not have  an  obligation  to defend any person under this indemnity; however, Subconsultant  shall  have  liability  for reasonable  and necessary defense costs incurred by persons indemnified to the extent caused by Subconsultant’s  negligence.”

*          *          *          *          *          *

To avoid contractual liability for legal fees under the above-quoted clause that would not be covered by insurance, the broker recommended that the final sentence be revised to read as follows: “Consultant shall have liability for reasonable and necessary defense cost incurred by persons indemnified to the extent caused by Consultant’s negligence herein and recoverable under applicable law on account of negligence.”

I agree with the broker that, unless the award is limited to the sum “recoverable under applicable law on account of negligence,” the indemnity of legal costs is not fully insured. Specifically, an award of legal costs in favor of the indemnitee against the engineer that is based on the contractual indemnity alone is excluded from coverage by the contractual liability exclusion of the policy. The amount of the award that is made under applicable law respecting recovery of plaintiff’s legal costs, apart from the contractual indemnity, could be covered under the policy depending upon terms and conditions of the policy.

In other words, if a state has a law for recovery of plaintiff’s legal costs against the engineer, an award under that law based upon negligence  might be covered under the professional liability policy, but any part of an award of attorneys fees that results only from a contractual indemnity obligation to indemnify a plaintiff’s legal fees will run afoul of the contractual liability exclusion of the policy and, therefore, be excluded from coverage.

As previously stated, in the United States, the laws of the individual states do not provide, routinely, for an award of plaintiff’s legal costs. That is the genesis of contractual indemnity of legal costs. Contractual indemnity “fills in” what the law does not otherwise order. Likewise, that is the reason the engineer would limit the contractual indemnity to the sum that state law would award. The “fill in” to enforce the contractual indemnity is not a liability that would have attached to the “insured” in the absence of such contract, warranty, guaranty or promise, to quote from the contractual liability exclusion contained in one insurance carrier’s policy.  For the reasons explained in this article, a party that agrees to indemnify another should beware that agreeing to reimburse the indemnitee for attorneys fees will likely create an uninsurable risk where those fees would not have been awarded by a court in the absence of the contractual obligation.

 

Questions, comments, thoughts?  Kent and I welcome your comments below.

 

 

Tues Tip: How NOT to give a deposition

In the off chance that you are sued, you will inevitably have to sit for a deposition at some point. This is a time when, under oath, you are asked to give testimony to the other side’s lawyer. Some depositions are easier than others. Found a little gem on youtube that I thought I’d share as an object lesson in how *not* to give a deposition. The video is about 1 minute long and is worth it to sit through to the end. (Warning: video contains cursing at end, so don’t watch if that offends):

Comments? Questions? Thoughts on how his angry outburst completely destroys his credibility?  Comment below.

Insurance Physical: worth the check up!

check up

An insurance "check up" can keep your business fit & healthy

Recently I was contacted by a blog reader– let’s call him Mark–  who suggested that I write a post on reviewing insurance policies. “Mark” shared a personal story in which, even though he had incorporated his business, he was sued personally under a “piercing the corporate veil” theory.  Essentially, the plaintiff was trying to get at his personal assets.  After reporting the claim to his insurance agent, he discovered he may not have had sufficient insurance coverage.  He did not have a D&O policy, which can provide protection for a corporation’s directors and officers.

Contrary to insurance being just another item to scratch off your list, take some time to review your insurance policies and see if you have the coverage you think you have, and if there are other coverages which you might need but have not yet obtained.  In addition to D&O policies, there are E&O (errors & omissions) policies for design professionals, CGL (commercial general liability) policies, builders’ risk policies, workers’ compensation policies, and umbrella policies, to name a few.  The language and endorsements in your particular policy are important, and it is worth taking time (perhaps annually) for an overall insurance-health checkup.

You should make sure that your insurance agent knows your business and the possible risks.  An insurance agent that specializes in your type of business is your best bet to ensure that you obtain and maintain full coverage.  In addition, it is a good idea to have your policies reviewed by your construction attorney, so you can learn exactly what is—and what is not—covered. 

Next week (on Wednesday), we will have a guest post on how indemnity language in your contracts can limit (or eliminate) your insurance coverage.  Stay tuned.

In the meantime, questions or comments about insurance for construction and design professionals?  Join the conversation in the comment section, below.  And if you haven’t already, please take my quick, 10 question Blog Survey.

Photo Courtesy of U.S. Army. 

Help me help you!

sign: we approve of this rest area

Feedback is always a good thing!

Want more of what you love on this blog, and less of what you don’t?  Then help me help you!  I have created a very short, 10 question survey to learn what topics you want to see covered, how often you like me to post, and related issues.  10 questions, 10 minutes, priceless opportunity.

Go HERE to complete the survey. 

And thanks, in advance.

 

Photo “The Most Curious Customer Feedback Survey I Have Ever Seen” by boltron via Flickr/Creative Commons License.

How Does a Construction Loan Work? (Tue Tip)

house and calculator 

For today’s tip, we have a guest post by Emma Martin on the process of obtaining a construction loan.  Emma writes for CB Structures, a family owned Construction and Engineering Company that specializes in garage buildings and pole building design.

As the name implies, a construction loan is specifically meant for those who wish to undertake the construction of a building rather than buying one that is already complete.  There are many reasons why an individual or entity would seek this type of loan, and there are actually several choices when it comes to securing such funding, from different loans to different lenders, but you may not realize that your reasons for wanting to construct a building (and your ultimate goal for your completed structure) may make a difference in not only how much money you can borrow, but what type of loan you get.  So before you go ahead and purchase a parcel of land, there are a few things you may want to consider.

  1. Your goal.  If you are a private individual, chances are you’re looking to build your dream home.  You may own land already or you may be seeking a space to erect your structure, but ultimately, you’re looking for a family home.  A company seeking a construction loan may be interested in owning office space or they may simply be in the business of building and selling property.  Whatever your goal, it will almost certainly have bearing on the type of loan you select, and it might also affect what a lender is willing to offer you.
  2. Credit score.  Your FICO score will definitely come into play any time you attempt to secure a loan, and planning for construction is no different.  A high credit rating will not only give you a better chance of getting approved for a loan, it will help you to set a budget.  Also taken into account are assets and outstanding debt, so you’ll want to try to pay off car loans and credit cards if you can (although you could also roll them into the new loan amount).
  3. Budget.  You need to start with a budget in mind.  You’d do the same for any large purchase, so do your homework before you get to the bank.  Find a piece of land you’d like to buy, get bids from contractors, and see if there are ways you can cut back while still getting what you want.  If you approach a lender with a solid plan for spending, you might have a better shot at getting the loan you desire.  Of equal importance is knowing what you can afford.  Just because you CAN get a loan for double what you think you’ll need doesn’t mean you SHOULD.  You should always opt for a 10-20% buffer for unexpected costs, but don’t take more than you can afford to pay back.
  4. Loan type.  Once you have formulated a plan, set a budget, and gotten approval, it’s time to consider loan options.  For private homeowners, the best bet is usually a 30-year fixed or 15-year fixed loan (the same type you would opt for in a home loan) because you can treat it like a mortgage rather than paying processing fees and closing costs twice (once for the construction loan and then again for the mortgage loan when construction is completed).  Those who are looking to build and sell immediately may do better with a short-term, low monthly payment loan such as an interest-only option.  This will allow them to allocate all of their resources to construction and recoup costs upon sale.
  5. Lending institution.  Rather than shopping around at local banks for a construction loan (which may not even be available), consider contacting a construction loan broker who will do the shopping for you.  They will have a good idea which lenders offer the type of loan you need and for a fee, they can probably get you the best deal in town.

 

Do you have experience getting a construction loan?  How difficult did you find the process to be?  What do you, as a construction professional, advise your clients?  Emma and I encourage you to share in the comments section below.

————————–

Photo ©iStockphoto.com/burtongirl