As regular readers of this Blog know, contracts are extremely important for all parties involved in a construction project. While verbal contracts can be enforced, a written contract, which is finely-tuned to your specific project, can save you a lot of time and money later on if the proverbial poo hits the fan.
I recently read AIA’s take on contracts, in their Construction Risk Brief (which you

Hopefully your own contracts don’t start like this handshake!
should subscribe to [free] if you have not already). Their featured article is on “Best Practices for Construction Contracts”. In the piece, they discuss 7 key points to address in each contract. I concur for the most part, although want to point out that some of them (such as the regular monitoring and documentation bullet point) are deserving of their own post, as there is a *lot* that can and does go wrong during the construction administration phase.
The AIA, of course, is interested in having you purchase a subscription to their 300+ form database. And, if you are involved in a lot of projects, you should definitely consider doing so. The AIA contracts have almost become the ‘gold standard’ of construction contracts due to their familiarity and popularity. They are not, however, a one-size-fits-all set of documents. The AIA contract forms themselves have some decisions or elections to make within them. And, you may find that an AIA contract doesn’t work for your project. For example, it may be too verbose for a small porch addition to a house, for example. If you work with homeowner clients, they will (rightly) be very intimidated by the length and breadth of an AIA contract—even a small project contract from the AIA.
Can a non-AIA contract be used successfully? Absolutely. It just needs to have the same key issues spelled out so all parties know the agreement.
Check out the AIA’s article, and let me know if your own contracts pass the test. If not, now is the time to update them to best protect yourself from future risk.



