Keeping your company in compliance with “The Man”

General Casey signing papers

Even Generals have to keep up with paperwork

As the year draws rapidly to a close, take some time to make sure that your company is in compliance with “the man.”  Whether your business is a Co., an Inc., an L.L.C., a P.A., or a P.L.L.C., you need to make sure that your business follows all applicable corporate formalities.  These include holding annual meetings, updating corporate minutes, and filing annual reports.  You need to ensure that your business is meeting all corporate formalities not just in the state where it is incorporated,  but also any other state in which the company is doing business.  Of course, it goes without saying that you need to also maintain proper professional licensing in each state in which you conduct business.

In addition to following governmental mandates, you should ensure that you are, in practice, keeping company money separate from personal finances and otherwise show that the corporation is more than “the mere instrumentality” of you as an individual.  If you fail to do so, you may be sued individually based on a “piercing the corporate veil” theory.  [There are many factors courts look at to make this determination, which include the domination/control of the corporate entity, inadequate capitalization, siphoning or commingling of funds with the dominant shareholder, and the absence of corporate records, among others].

As we discussed with the insurance check-up, you should also consider a yearly corporate check-up with your attorney to keep your corporation intact and your personal assets protected.  If you would like to discuss having such a corporate check-up, give me a ring.  And as always, your comments, thoughts, and questions are welcome in the comment section below.

_________________

Photo courtesy of U.S. Army.

Careful! Your contract may create uninsurable loss

 

Kent Holland
Kent Holland

Today’s Guest Post is by  J. Kent Holland, a construction lawyer located in Tysons Corner, Virginia,  with a national practice representing design professionals, contractors and project owners.  He is also founder & president of ConstructionRisk, LLC, a consulting firm providing consulting services to owners, design professionals, contractors and attorneys on construction projects.    His guest post is very timely, considering last week’s post on insurance check-ups for your business.   

 

Agreeing to Pay Reasonable Attorneys Fees as Part of Indemnification May Create Uninsurable Loss

 A question that is asked with increasing frequency is whether attorneys fees incurred pursuant to an indemnity clause are insurable where they are not incurred due to a duty to defend (i.e., paid on behalf of the indemnitee) but are instead paid after the litigation is complete and the indemnitor (e.g., engineer) is found liable for damages due to its negligence.  The short answer is that unless the court would have awarded the attorneys fees against the engineer in the absence of the contractual obligation to pay attorneys that was created by the indemnification provision, the attorneys fees will not be covered by the professional liability policy.  The contractual liability exclusion of the policy applies to such contractually created attorneys fees obligation.

A typical indemnification clause that includes payment of attorneys fees as part of indemnification rather than as part of a duty to defend is the following:

INDEMNIFICATION

The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner, its  parent,  affiliates and their respective directors, officers and employees (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, judgments,  demands,  losses, costs, liability, damages, and expenses, of any kind (including reasonable attorneys fees)   for  injuries  to  persons  (including but not limited to death) or damage to property to the extent any  of the foregoing are caused by any negligent act, error, or omission of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and  persons  for  whom  Consultant  is  legally responsible in  the performance of the Services.

Although this clause may look innocuous in that the indemnification is limited to negligence, it may nevertheless create uninsurable loss by virtue of the attorneys fees that are included in the indemnification.  Under American Jurisprudence, the courts do not award attorneys fees to the prevailing party unless the contract creates such a duty or unless there is some legal basis such as a civil statute that would establish the basis for the award of attorneys fees.

An insurance broker was recently asked by his client (an engineering firm) to consider the insurance ramifications of an indemnification clause somewhat similar to what was quoted above.  Instead of containing the reference to reasonable attorneys fee within its text, however, the clause included an additional sentence that stated:  “Consultant shall not have  an  obligation  to defend any person under this indemnity; however, Subconsultant  shall  have  liability  for reasonable  and necessary defense costs incurred by persons indemnified to the extent caused by Subconsultant’s  negligence.”

*          *          *          *          *          *

To avoid contractual liability for legal fees under the above-quoted clause that would not be covered by insurance, the broker recommended that the final sentence be revised to read as follows: “Consultant shall have liability for reasonable and necessary defense cost incurred by persons indemnified to the extent caused by Consultant’s negligence herein and recoverable under applicable law on account of negligence.”

I agree with the broker that, unless the award is limited to the sum “recoverable under applicable law on account of negligence,” the indemnity of legal costs is not fully insured. Specifically, an award of legal costs in favor of the indemnitee against the engineer that is based on the contractual indemnity alone is excluded from coverage by the contractual liability exclusion of the policy. The amount of the award that is made under applicable law respecting recovery of plaintiff’s legal costs, apart from the contractual indemnity, could be covered under the policy depending upon terms and conditions of the policy.

In other words, if a state has a law for recovery of plaintiff’s legal costs against the engineer, an award under that law based upon negligence  might be covered under the professional liability policy, but any part of an award of attorneys fees that results only from a contractual indemnity obligation to indemnify a plaintiff’s legal fees will run afoul of the contractual liability exclusion of the policy and, therefore, be excluded from coverage.

As previously stated, in the United States, the laws of the individual states do not provide, routinely, for an award of plaintiff’s legal costs. That is the genesis of contractual indemnity of legal costs. Contractual indemnity “fills in” what the law does not otherwise order. Likewise, that is the reason the engineer would limit the contractual indemnity to the sum that state law would award. The “fill in” to enforce the contractual indemnity is not a liability that would have attached to the “insured” in the absence of such contract, warranty, guaranty or promise, to quote from the contractual liability exclusion contained in one insurance carrier’s policy.  For the reasons explained in this article, a party that agrees to indemnify another should beware that agreeing to reimburse the indemnitee for attorneys fees will likely create an uninsurable risk where those fees would not have been awarded by a court in the absence of the contractual obligation.

 

Questions, comments, thoughts?  Kent and I welcome your comments below.

 

 

Insurance Physical: worth the check up!

check up

An insurance "check up" can keep your business fit & healthy

Recently I was contacted by a blog reader– let’s call him Mark–  who suggested that I write a post on reviewing insurance policies. “Mark” shared a personal story in which, even though he had incorporated his business, he was sued personally under a “piercing the corporate veil” theory.  Essentially, the plaintiff was trying to get at his personal assets.  After reporting the claim to his insurance agent, he discovered he may not have had sufficient insurance coverage.  He did not have a D&O policy, which can provide protection for a corporation’s directors and officers.

Contrary to insurance being just another item to scratch off your list, take some time to review your insurance policies and see if you have the coverage you think you have, and if there are other coverages which you might need but have not yet obtained.  In addition to D&O policies, there are E&O (errors & omissions) policies for design professionals, CGL (commercial general liability) policies, builders’ risk policies, workers’ compensation policies, and umbrella policies, to name a few.  The language and endorsements in your particular policy are important, and it is worth taking time (perhaps annually) for an overall insurance-health checkup.

You should make sure that your insurance agent knows your business and the possible risks.  An insurance agent that specializes in your type of business is your best bet to ensure that you obtain and maintain full coverage.  In addition, it is a good idea to have your policies reviewed by your construction attorney, so you can learn exactly what is—and what is not—covered. 

Next week (on Wednesday), we will have a guest post on how indemnity language in your contracts can limit (or eliminate) your insurance coverage.  Stay tuned.

In the meantime, questions or comments about insurance for construction and design professionals?  Join the conversation in the comment section, below.  And if you haven’t already, please take my quick, 10 question Blog Survey.

Photo Courtesy of U.S. Army. 

The 123s of Current NC Lien Law: Issues for Owners

Last week, we talked about the ABCs of liens for contractors, subcontractors, and design professionals.  For every yin, there is a yang.  Today we’ll talk about the 123’s of how to handle a lien claim if you are the Owner of the property. 
 
   James Bond 007   An Owner can always “Bond off” a lien
  

—————-

If you are  the owner of the property, you may not have been aware that subcontractors were not being paid, if lien waivers were not being submitted or were fraudulently executed by the general contractor.  Being served with a Notice of Claim of Lien on Funds and/or a Claim of Lien on Real Property can literally stop work on a project.  Many construction deeds of trust and similar bank financing require owners to keep the property free from liens or other claims on title.

If you are the Owner faced with a Lien on your property, what can you do?

Rule #1:  Never pay “over” a lien.  Even if you owe the contractor $80,000, and the subcontractor’s lien is for $5,000, do not think you can set aside $5,000 for the subcontractor (to be worked out later) and pay the contractor $75,000.

Rule #2:  Consider your options carefully:

            Option 1:  Finish the project without any additional payment to the contractor.  Pay for a replacement contractor to finish, offset those payments, pay lien claimants from remaining funds.

             Option 2:  Issue a joint check payable to the lien claimant and the contractor.

             Option 3:  Bond off the lien upon funds (N.C.Gen. Stat. 44A-20)

             To bond off the lien, you issue either a bond (equal to 1 ¼ ) or a cash payment (equal to the full lien value) to the Clerk of Court, which is held pending resolution of the dispute.

Rule #3:  If the project is upside down, consider negotiating directly with a subcontractor for a reduced payment in exchange for a lien cancellation filed by the subcontractor.

Rule #4:  Whatever you do, do it after consultation with your construction law attorney.  Liens cannot be ignored, and properly handling them can make or break your project.

Experience working with a lien on your property?  How did you handle the situation?   Also, as always, if you have questions or comments about this or any other post, drop me a line. 

Note:  While I welcome comments from all, be aware that  I do not currently accept homeowner (residential) clients.

———————————

Photo “James bond – quantum of solace” by Julien Haler via Flickr/Creative Commons license.   

 

The ABCs of Current NC Lien Law

Since we talked last week about possible changes to the lien law, I’ve had a few folks ask me to take a step back and discuss the ABCs of current lien law in North Carolina.  Ask and ye shall receive………..

 Part 1:  Lien Law Rights for Contractors, Subcontractors, & Design Professionals

Who can file a lien?

Anyone who furnishes materials or labor to improve real property can file a lien on that property.  This includes design professionals who provide services related to improvement of real property, contractors, and subcontractors (down to the 3rd tier). 

What types of liens are there in NC?

There are three types of lien claims in North Carolina.

1.  The Claim of Lien on Real Property (NC Gen. Stat. §44A-12) is for a person who contracts directly with the owner of the property.  This can be a general contractor, a separate independent contractor, or a design professional.

2.  The Notice of Claim of Lien upon Funds (NC Gen. Stat. §44A-18 and §44A-19) is available to subcontractors (down to third-tier subcontractors), and allows them to have a lien right to any funds owed to the party that contracted with them in the chain of title.  In other words, if the owner still owes money to the general contractor, and the owner receives a Notice of Claim of Lien upon Funds by a subcontractor (and the lawsuit to enforce the lien is thereafter properly filed), the owner cannot pay the general contractor until the subcontractor’s lien is extinguished.

3.  The Subrogated Claim of Lien on Real Property (NC Gen. Stat. §44A-23) also provides real property lien rights to the subcontractor, to the extent the party he contracted with has lien rights.

When and Where must a lien be filed?

Lien claims in North Carolina must be filed in the clerk of court where the property is located, within 120 days of the claimant’s last date of furnishing. 

What does “perfecting a lawsuit” mean?

A lawsuit must be filed to enforce the lien.  This is called “perfecting” the lien, and it must be done within 180 days of a claimant’s last date of furnishing.  The lawsuit can be filed in any proper county so long as an appropriate Lis Pendens is also timely filed in the county where the property is located. 

What special remedies are available for a lien claim?

If a lien lawsuit is perfected and a judgment rendered, the court can direct the property to be sold to satisfy the lien.  Additionally, you can recover attorney fees for the lien lawsuit.  Pretty cool, huh?

  souffle

Crafting a proper lien is like making souffle- no room for error!

In summary:

As you can imagine, liens can be very powerful tools to help ensure recovery of money owed to contractors and subcontractors on a project.  The key to exercising your lien rights is to keep watch on the running of the claim period (use of online resources can help with this)  and to ensure that the lien is (1) properly drafted; (2) timely served; (3) appropriately filed; (4) perfected with a timely lawsuit.  This is not an area where you can make a mistake—liens are subject to strict rules that must be followed to the t.  If in doubt about a lien issue, contact a knowledgeable construction law attorney in your jurisdiction.

We’ll continue our discussion with Part 2 (next Thursday), when we discuss how to handle a lien on your property if you are the Owner

Comments about your experience using liens to maximize your chances of recovery?  Post below.  [And as always, please sign up for an email subscription to the blog  if you have not already done so].

—————————

Photo “Soufflé” by stu_spivack via Flickr/Wikimedia/Creative Commons