Tag Archives: change

Follow your Change Order Requirements

Posted on by

 check markIt is extremely important that you follow your written contract requirements.  No where is this more evident than in the change order process.

Most contracts have an explicit provision for the payment for additional work– and they generally require a written, signed change order (or change directive) before the work is performed.  Can you get by with verbal agreements for additional work? Sometimes yes, sometimes no.  Will it be much harder to get paid for additional services without a signed change order? You bet.  So why put yourself through that trouble?

Often times parties begin to “waive” formal requirements for written change orders, and construction projects are often on tight deadlines where stopping work to get a fully executed change order would bog down the schedule.  However, you run the risk of throwing yourself on the mercy of the Court when you don’t play by the contract rules.

A new case out of the Eastern District of Virginia demonstrates this fact very clearly.  In Artistic Stone v. Safeco, 2010 WL 2977894 (E.D.Va July 27, 2010), the Court held that the requirement that change orders be in writing was to be strictly construed and the subcontractor in that case could not recover for verbal change orders that violated the written change order requirement.  The Court held that where there is a method to ensure recovery of additional extra work in the written contract, the subcontractor could not recover additional money when it failed to follow that method.

“Written change order requirements maintain order and predictability in the construction business, and are meant ‘to avoid subsequent disagreement, and prevent just such a controversy as has arisen in this case.  For this reason, ‘where there is a method under the contract by which a party can insure the recovery of the cost of extra work, that party is not entitled to recovery where it fails to follow that method.'” Artistic Stone Crafters at 5.   [Internal citations omitted.]

A North Carolina court would likely concur.

To ensure you can fully recover for extra work, make sure it is authorized.  Follow the contract.  If circumstances make it so you cannot always follow the contract terms, document the situation as best as you can.  A follow-up email, confirming a verbal change order, would at least provide written evidence you can present in Court, should it come to that.  Otherwise, arguments can and will be made that the person who gave the change order wasn’t authorized to do so, and you may be stuck with no recovery for the extra work.

_______________________

Photo “white check mark on blue- acrylic on canvas” by kylemac via Flickr via Creative Commons license.

No more Liens when a General Contractor is in Bankruptcy—the new North Carolina law?

Posted on by

Unfortunately, bankruptcy is an all too common occurrence in today’s economy.  Companies which have been stalwarts of the construction industry are falling like dominos and entering into the protective waters of bankruptcy.  What effect does a bankruptcy filing have on your ability to file or perfect a lien?  A lot.

Until very recently, the general practice in North Carolina was that even if the general contractor was in bankruptcy, a subcontractor could still proceed with a lien on real property to the extent funds remained due and owing from the property owner.  It was common practice for subcontractors to serve a notice of claim of lien on funds and claim of lien on real property to the property owner even if the general contractor had filed bankruptcy, and no bankruptcy court approval was needed.

Recently, however, three cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina Bankruptcy Court (which extends from Raleigh to the Coast) have ended this practice and called into doubt whether any lien right can be preserved after the general contractor files bankruptcy.  The three cases are In re Shearin Family Investments, LLC, Case No. 08-07082080-JRL (Bankr. EDNC April 17, 2009); In re Harrelson Utilities, Inc., Case No. 09-025815-8-ATS (Bankr. EDNC July 30, 2009); and In re Mammoth Grading, Inc., Case No. 09-01286-8-ATS (Bankr. EDNC July 31, 2009).

In these cases, the Courts have held that no lien arises until it is perfected; therefore, if the notice of a lien on funds is not served prior to the bankruptcy filing, it is disallowed and the subcontractor (or supplier) will be treated as an unsecured creditor in the bankruptcy.  The Harrelson and Mammoth cases are on appeal, and the issue currently only concerns the Eastern District, although the Middle and Western Districts would likely treat those opinions with deference.

If these decisions stand, and become the new law of the land, then contractors and material suppliers must remain extra vigilant about account receivables and in pursuing lien rights if any sign of financial insecurity is suspected in the general contractor.

A detailed discussion of the facts of these three cases and each of their legal holdings can be found in article “To Assert or Not to Assert? Can Contractors Afford to Wait to assert Their Lien Rights”  (by Wayne Maiorano, Amos Priester, and Anna Osterhout), which first appeared in the October 2009 issue of the North Carolina Bar Association‘s  Construction Law Section newsletter, The Change Order.

 

Pay When Paid Clauses in the NC Construction Contract

Posted on by

“Pay when paid” clauses are clauses found in many construction contracts that state that the contractor will pay his subcontractor only if and/or when the contractor receives payment from the owner.   Are these clauses enforceable?  The answer depends on (1) what state you are in and (2) what choice of law provision is contained in your construction contract.

A limited number of states do honor “pay when paid” clauses under the theory that the parties are usually sophisticated parties who negotiated the contract terms and as such they are duty bound to honor those terms.   When such a clause is enforced, it can prove fatal in a case where the owner files bankruptcy or otherwise defaults on its payments to the general contractor.

In North Carolina,  such clauses are unenforceable as against public policy.

Performance by a subcontractor in accordance with the provisions of its contract shall entitle it to payment from the party with whom it contracts. Payment by the owner to a contractor is not a condition precedent for payment to a subcontractor and payment by a contractor to a subcontractor is not a condition precedent for payment to any other subcontractor, and an agreement to the contrary is unenforceable.

N. C. Gen. Stat. Section 22C-2.

Does that mean that, if you are a subcontractor, you don’t need to worry about such “pay when paid” clauses in North Carolina?  Not necessarily.  It depends on what law is the law that will be applied by the court.  If your contract states that the law of another state will apply, you need to know if that state is one in which “pay when paid” clauses are enforceable.  In some states, such as Virginia, the contract is king and whatever the contract says will be enforced.  Such clauses are also generally enforceable in a few other states such as Connecticut and Michigan.

Other states take a more cautious view, and hold that such clauses are only enforceable if unambiguously written, including  Arizona, Ohio, and Massachusetts.

States which concur with North Carolina’s view that such clauses are unenforceable include New York, California, and South Carolina.

Therefore, it is important to know not only what your contract says, but what state’s law will apply to your contract.

Because case law and statutes change the law regularly, consult a licensed attorney in the jurisdiction you are concerned about to learn the latest status of contingent payment clauses in that jurisdiction.

NC Construction Law Seminar in Greensboro

Posted on by

Excuse the little self-promotion here, but if you want a quick way to learn more about construction issues in North Carolina, I’m speaking at a seminar on May 7, 2010 in Greensboro, NC.

The seminar topics include:
* Understanding Liens, Bonds, and Payment Issues
* Risk Transfer (including insurance and indemnity issues)
* Making Changes & Resolving Disputes during the Construction Process
* Contracts and Subcontracts on Public Projects
* Recent Bankruptcy Cases Impacting Contractors’ Lien Rights

The seminar qualifies for 6.0 PDHs for NC Engineers, 0.6 CSI CEUs, and NC Attorney CLE credit is pending.

Joining me in speaking are Eric Biesecker, Jennifer Maldonado, and Brian Edlin. For more details or to register, go to Half Moon Seminars.

Managing Changes on the Construction Project

Posted on by

As sure as Santa’s arrival each year, the setting of the sun each night, and the arrival of the bowl games each December, there will be changes to a construction project.   How you manage those changes is important.  If you can properly document delays, changes in scope, or other issues, you can recoup your time and expenses.  If you fail to manage changes well, you are literally throwing money away.  And– if you are a design professional and do not have a good system in place for handling change order requests, you are almost guaranteeing a lawsuit at the end of the project.  Read more on Managing Changes on the construction Project  at this link.