A few years back, we discussed the Orders of Precedence clause in Construction Contracts. I wrote a post talking about how having such a clause in a contract can help the parties navigate in the grey areas where specifications and drawings may disagree.
My post generated a follow up guest post from Phil Kabza, a MasterSpec specialist, on what he saw as the problems with an order of precedence clause in truly protecting all parties to the contract.
This week, Phil’s guest post generated a new, and thought-provoking (flame-provoking?) comment from “Joe GC”. Joe writes:
It is another very typical situation of the Architect and Engineer doing a poor job and then trying to seek relief of their error at the contractors expense. Phil’s comments are based on the fact that all contractors are not ethical, which is simply not true. If the subcontractor is the expert, then why are the drawings and specifications prepared by Architect’s and Engineer?
This is exactly why Design Build delivery methods are becoming more popular by the day. Single source responsibility from someone who really is an expert, not someone who has a lot of education and therefore purports to be an expert.
In otherwords in laymen’s terms “If I have to verify everything you draw and specify Mr. Architect, then why do I need you in the process at all”? If you are not responsible for the review of the submittals then why do I need to send them to you? No more “approved” stamps just “reviewed” stamps; it’s becoming a joke!
When will the Design Community wake up? That is why so many Architects and Engineers are now finding themselves working for contractors. You are responsible for the Design Mr. Architect, it is cut and dry, simple as that, not rocket science and you do not need to be AIA or P.E. to understand it.
AIA needs to do more training, especially when it comes to spending time in the field. They need to understand what they are designing, just as the contractor needs to understand what he is building. They have never seen it that way because they think they are above the contractor or smarter than the contractor.
Until they learn they are not better or smarter because of classroom education things will not be improving and the lawyers will continue to be the most successful.
Interesting perspective as to why Design Build is becoming more popular. I think Joe is correct that Design Build is more popular now, but I think it has less to do with concerns about design professionals avoiding liability and more to do with the economic value in having the “buck stopping” at one single entity.
Is there a perception that designers are classroom educated but not field trained? Is it a fair one? Share YOUR thoughts with Joe and me, below.