Should You Be a LEED Green Associate? (Tue Tip)

LEED Green Associate

Those of you who follow my twitter stream know that I recently passed the exam to become accredited as a LEED Green Associate.  The LEED Green Associate is a new credential, and the first level of credentialing that also includes the LEED-Accredited Professional + Specialty.

Why did I do it?  I wanted to have a better understanding of the various LEED requirements and sustainability issues when working with my architect and engineering clients.  Many of my A/E clients are AP certified — most before the new burdensomedetailed requirements were issued (not that I’m bitter or anything!).   I, on the other hand, knew just enough about green design to be dangerous.

While I’m ready not exactly ready to go out and leap tall (green) buildings (no doubt complete with vegetated roof) in a single bound, I do have a much broader understanding of the intricacies of complying with not just Code issues but also LEED issues in mind.

So, to return to the title, should YOU get a LEED Green Associate accreditation?  Yes.  If you are reading here, then you probably would benefit.  (Unless you StumbleUpon’d your way here, in which case, not necessarily!)  If you work with architects and engineers, and certainly if you are an A/E and haven’t yet gotten green credentialing, get your Green Associate credential.   You will learn about a wide cross-section of green issues, including sustainable sites (SS), water efficiency (WE), energy & atmosphere (EA), materials & resources (MR), indoor environmental quality (EQ), innovation in design (ID), and regional priority issues.

Are you interested in becoming a Green Associate?  Let me know and I can share some study tips. 

Or, are you already accredited with the USGBC?  Under the old or new system?  What has it taught you?  Share in the comment section below.

  ———————–

“LEED Green Associate” and the LEED Green Associate logo are trademarks owned by the U.S. Green Building Council and are awarded to individuals under license by the Green Building Certification Institute.

Case Studies for Sustainable Landscapes (Tue Tip)

stormwater treatment basin with aquatic plants

Interested in incorporating sustainable landscape solutions into your projects?  The Landscape Architecture Foundation (LAF) has a database of case studies just for you!

LAF’s Landscape Performance Series is an online interactive set of resources to demonstrate the value of sustainable landscapes to agencies, owners, advocates, and others.

The Performance Series includes:

  • Case Study Briefs
  • Benefits Toolkit
  • Factoid Library
  • Scholarly Works

Check it out!

Do you have a favorite resource on the web for your design practice?  If so, drop me a line so I can share your find with your fellow architects, engineers, and construction professionals. 

————————-

Photo: from LAF’s Performance Series Case Study Brief: Kroon Hall, Yale School of Forestry

Japan’s Wind Power Still Working (Plus Tues Tip)



Japan wind farm

Recently I came across some good news out of Japan:  their wind farms are still working, despite the calamities that nation has faced in the past week.

As I previously noted, wind power is picking up speed as a viable green energy source.  The news out of Japan gives wind power another “feather in its cap”.

According to Yoshinori Ueda, leader of the International Committee of the Japan Wind Power Association & Japan Wind Energy Association, there has been no wind facility damage reported by any association members, from either the earthquake or the tsunami. Even the Kamisu semi-offshore wind farm, located about 300km from the epicenter of the quake, survived.

To read more about how the Japanese wind farms survived, read the full story from Kelly Rigg, HuffPost writer. 

Tuesday Tip: 

Ms. Riggs is also Executive Director of the Global Cool Cities Alliance (GCCA), which has a very interesting website  which explains the science behind  reducing Heat Island effects in cities through the use of light-colored, reflective roofs.  

——————–

 Photo:  A wind farm in Kuzumaki, Iwate, Japan via jasohill.

Are there Enough Incentives for Green Building? (guest post)

For today’s Tuesday Tip we have a guest post by Drake MacDonald. 

According to Drake, his brief experience in construction introduced him to the profession’s many shortcomings, and as an editor and writer for ConstructionManagement.net, he works to promote construction management education in the hopes of raising industry standards of organization, communication, and sustainability.

Today, many construction projects are aimed toward going green. Not only does green construction benefit the environment, it also helps people save money on energy bills. To someone who doesn’t know anything about construction management, green construction may seem daunting. Many associate going green with spending more money on construction. However that isn’t always the case. [Editor’s note: As previously discussed, sometimes costs are too high.]  Some government incentives actually help people save money on green construction projects. Yet, oftentimes these incentives don’t go far enough. Here is a look at some of the incentives owners get for green buildings and what the government can do to improve them.

The biggest government incentives for going green are the tax breaks, which apply to both individuals and corporations. Individuals can enjoy a number of tax credits for going green. For instance, the Residential Energy Efficiency Tax Credit provides people with a tax credit for making everything from their windows to furnaces more energy efficient. The Residential Renewable Energy Tax Credit goes even further, by offering an even larger tax break to homeowners who build or remodel their homes to take advantage of solar or wind energy. Likewise, businesses can receive tax credits for showing a commitment to renewable energy as well as investing in new energy.

Beyond tax breaks, there are rebates, exemptions, grants and loans geared toward helping people with green construction projects. There are rewards for energy performance as well. There are also state incentives, including rebates for using renewable energy, which allow homeowners to further capitalize on building a green home.

Essentially, almost any green improvement an owner makes to his building will allow him to take advantage of at least one of these incentives. These grants and loans can help curb the financial stress that comes with a green construction project. Additionally, energy incentives save the owner money over the long-term, and that should be factored in to cost considerations.

keep my money GREEN sign

While the government does an exceptional job of providing people with plenty of incentives to go green, it can do more to promote them. Many owners are not even aware that these incentives exist. In order to better advertise these incentives, the government should set up a universal Web site where those interested in green building can discover all available incentives for which they qualify. The government should also consider sending out mailings, as well as television advertising to promote its green building incentives.

The government should also focus on gearing more incentives to individuals. While several incentives for homeowners do exist, the majority of green building incentives are designed to benefit corporations. Furthermore, the government should remove all expiration dates on existing incentives. Many incentives have already expired or will expire in the coming months. Owners should be rewarded no matter when they make green improvements, and the elimination of incentives is likely to only deter green building from continuing.

Clearly the government has started a great incentive program for going green; however, it needs to continue, through both advertising and through making green incentives permanent.  If the government is truly dedicated to promoting green building, it needs to make an effort to grow the program instead of phasing out incentives.

Melissa again:  Do you agree or disagree with Drake?  Drop Drake and me a line in the comment section below.

————————————

Photo by smiteme via Creative Commons license.

Wind Power: It’s in the air!

wind power turbines[note: this article was originally published on March 10, 2011]

Wind Power.  It’s been defined as green, clean, sustainable, and even affordable.  In an effort to be more “green,” save or even generate money, and reduce waste, several companies are turning to the wind turbine.

In Indiana, Purdue University and its commercial partner Performance Services have planned and designed a  $200 million wind farm scheduled to begin generating electric power by late 2012.  Earlier this week, the University gave approval to proceed with the project, which will involve obtaining regulatory approval.  If the project is approved, the team hopes to generate 100 megawatts, which could power up to 25,000 homes.

In Canada, Greengate Power Corp. just this week  has received provincial approval from the Alberta Utilities Commission to build Canada’s largest wind farm in southern Alberta.  The project  is expected to be Canada’s largest operating wind energy project with a total generating capacity of 300 megawatts when it is completed.

Also this week, in a town outside of Boston, the local Conservation Commission has approved a wind turbine project, despite objections from the local golf club.

Closer to home, Iberdrola Renewables earlier this year filed an application with the North Carolina Utilities Commission to build what would be the state’s first commercial wind farm in Pasquotank and Perquimans counties.  If approved, the project would occupy approximately 20,000 acres of private land near Elizabeth City, and could potentially provide electricity for 55,000 to 70,000 North Carolina homes.  Construction of the structure, if approved, is slated to begin by the end of this year and could create about 400 jobs.

Share your thoughts:

What is your opinion of wind turbines? Do they make sense?  Is the return on investment worth the additional upfront costs? Do you just plain think they are ugly and not want them in your backyard, or do you see them as modern art and things of beauty?  Drop me a comment!

——————————-

Photo:  FreeFoto.com