Green Construction with Governor Perdue (Tue Tip)

NC Green Building Triangle Chapter LogoAct now to get early bird tickets to the USGBC NC Triangle Chapter’s spring Luncheon, featuring NC Governor Bev Perdue and others on the topic of the Green Business Fund, which was created to “make environmental innovation investments in alternative fuels, green construction, and other clean energy technologies – positioning North Carolina to become a national leader in environmental technology and in high-wage green collar jobs.”

Be sure and arrive at early so you can enjoy the exhibit hall featuring the region’s top green builders and suppliers and network with other committed professionals. 

When:  Thursday, March 24th

Time:  11:00 am to 2:00 pm

Where: Radisson Hotel RTP, 150 Park Drive, Durham NC 27709

How:  Register here by Friday, May 18th for early bird pricing.

Registration:
Members of the Triangle Chapter – $35 ($45 after May 18)
Non-Members – $45 (55 after May 18)
Students – $25 ($35 after May 18)

Are you planning on attending?  Let me know and we can meet up!

Shameless Self Promotion (Please Vote!)

As long-time blog readers may remember, last year I won the “Best Construction Blog” award from Construction Marketing Ideas, thanks in large part to you.  The “shameless marketing favor” post has come ’round again, with a twist. 

cool keyboard construction

Right now, Construction Law in North Carolina has been nominated for TWO different award competitions.  If you have a minute (or two- get it?) to spare, I’d love your vote in both places: 

  • Construction Marketing Ideas “Best Construction Blog” contest.  (Scroll down about halfway to find Construction Law in North Carolina.  Note that this blog is not Construction Law Carolinas, which is colleague Greg Shelton’s very good Charlotte-based blog.  You can, however, vote for *both* of us, and any other blog which strikes your fancy, as there is no limit to which nominees you can vote for.  Voting ends 5 p.m. on March 30, 2012.
  • JDR’s Annual Industry Blogger Award, in the “Construction Business” category.  (Full disclosure: this one comes with a small $ stipend if I by any chance win!).  Voting ends April 13, 2012.

Would love to have your votes in one or both!  And be sure to check out all the other fine blogs at both contests– you will find some gems among the nominees.

Photo: (c) Matt @ stupidfresh

 

Construction Lawsuit Facts & Figures (infographic)

Yesterday, we had a post discussing the negligence lawsuits that can arise out of construction accidents.  Today, an infographic demonstrating some ground-breaking construction lawsuit facts & figures, courtesy of the folks at Datadial.  [One note on the graphic below: as always, laws can be different in different states. Homeowners in North Carolina, for example, cannot sue for building construction issues after the house is 6 years old due to NC’s statute of repose.  Always check the laws in your jurisdiction/End of legalisms!] 

construction safety infographic

 

 

Day Laborers & NC’s Lowest Responsible Bidder law (News Note)

blue jean contractorsTriangle Grading and Paving is a Triad-area company with multiple public contracts, 18 since 2000 from the NC Department of Transportation alone. Frequently the low bidder, Triangle Grading has a long history of performing work for the state. However, a recent high profile controversy has threatened to remove the company from the bid lists for public construction work.  In this past year, the company was fined $400,000 by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The Burlington-based company has the highest fine in North Carolina dating back as far as 2009.  

As you undoubtedly are well aware, North Carolina law requires that any public construction project requiring an estimated total expenditure of greater than $500,000 (or an estimated expenditure on supplies and materials greater than $90,000) be subject to formal bidding procedures. Further, the state or municipality soliciting the bids is required to accept “the lowest responsible bidder.” Some of the factors taken into consideration when determining what a responsible bid is includes performance, quality, and time to completion as specified in the bid.

Knowing that the contract must go to the lowest responsible bidder, contractors may be tempted to cut corners by hiring undocumented workers, who work for less pay than their documented counterparts. By hiring such workers, contractors can lower labor costs significantly, making them much more likely to be the bidder who wins the lucrative project.

Immigration fines may not cause Triangle Grading to lose all potential public clients. The DOT has stated that, when conducting the yearly review of its list of contractors, that while “safety records will be considered […] immigration fines would not be a factor.” However, Winston-Salem is investigating whether these immigration violations should merit a removal from the bid list.

What are your experiences with the requirement of “lowest responsible bidder” on state projects?  Are there changes that need to be made to the program?  Can the system be gamed? Post in the comment section, below.

And, if you have not already signed up for email delivery of these posts, please do so on the right hand side of the blog’s main page.  You’ll not only never miss another post, but you’ll also get a copy of my free white paper on the 7 critical mistakes that engineers and architects make on construction projects.

Photo: (c)   )

New Safety Standards Issued by ASSE and ANSI (News Note)

asse_logo

 

 

 

The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)  have recently announced their approval of two new safety standards to enhance construction site safety.

The two new standards, which are set to take effect during June 2012, are the ANSI/ASSE A10.1-2011 Pre-Project and Pre-Task Safety and Health Planning for Construction and Demolition Operations, and the ANSI/ASSE A10.26-2011 Emergency Procedures for Construction and Demolition Sites.

The new A10.1-2011 standard was designed to assist construction owners, contractors, and designers by ensuring that safety and health planning were standard parts of their pre-construction planning. It is also intended to help owners of construction sites to establish a process for evaluating constructor candidates with regard to their safety and health performance planning.

The A10.26 standard applies to emergency situations, including fires, collapses, and hazardous spills. The standard deals with emergency rescue, evacuation, and transportation of injured workers, and also plans for coordinating with emergency medical facilities ahead of potential disasters.

In addition, the ANSI/ASSE A10.33-2011 standard, Safety and Health Program Requirements for Multi-Employer Projects, received an update, which will become effective May 7, 2012. The standard delivers minimum requirements for programs where multiple employers are engaged in a common undertaking, and is intended to address cost-efficient and coordinated safety on the construction site.

These new standards are part of a larger rollout designed by the A10 Accredited Standards Committee on Safety Requirements for Construction and Demolition operations.

Comments or questions? Drop me a line in the comments section, below.

Source: ABC.org.